<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Programmers Hotel &#187; Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://programmershotel.com/programming/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://programmershotel.com</link>
	<description>A blog about software development while traveling..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Original Retweets&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/</link>
		<comments>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joe_carney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmershotel.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Mashable reported on Twitter&#8217;s new Retweet function. Today I was invited into Twitter&#8217;s Retweet beta&#8230; So far so good&#8230; Like the rest of Twitter&#8217;s interface, the options are well laid out and become visible only when required. What surprised me most (and pretty ingenious of Twitter to introduce this) was how the retweet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/05/twitter-retweet-rollout/" target="_blank">Mashable</a> reported on Twitter&#8217;s new Retweet function.  Today I was invited into Twitter&#8217;s Retweet beta&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://programmershotel.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/42031727-380x127.png" alt="Retweet Beta..." title="Retweet Beta..." width="380" height="127" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-43" /></p>
<p><span id="more-42"></span></p>
<p>So far so good&#8230;  Like the rest of Twitter&#8217;s interface, the options are well laid out and become visible only when required.</p>
<p>What surprised me most (and pretty ingenious of Twitter to introduce this) was how the retweet appears.</p>
<p>If I understand correctly, what this means is that Twitter will allow you to see the original tweet.  </p>
<p>No matter how many times it has been retweeted!</p>
<p>As each person retweets, what you see in your stream will NOT be the user you follow, but the actual user who wrote the tweet.</p>
<p><img src="http://programmershotel.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-10-at-14.31.31-380x162.png" alt="Retweet..." title="Retweet..." width="380" height="162" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-44" /></p>
<p>If you look closely, you can see who has retweeted the link (in this case <strong>Retweeted by Hillel</strong>) so you can source the retweet.</p>
<h2>How will this affect Twitter?</h2>
<p>Immediately, you probably wont see much difference.  </p>
<p>It will take a while for developers to catch up with the Twitter API and integrate this feature.</p>
<p>In the long run?  Quite a huge difference me thinks.  Let me explain&#8230;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you follow a user who retweets a lot (I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ve all got a few in our Twitter streams).  </p>
<p>Their image (or personal brand) appears multiple times in your stream and you become to recognise them from their image before you read their tweet.  </p>
<p>You learn to recognise them as a user who shares a lot of valuable information.  Why else would you be following them?</p>
<p>With the new Retweet functionality, these user images (or personal brands) could become very weak or diluted over time.  </p>
<p>They are still sending you quality tweets of information, but you may not even be aware it is them who is sending it!</p>
<h2>What then?</h2>
<p>At present, people acknowledge the source of their tweet.  They use a <strong>RT @user</strong> or <strong>(via @user)</strong> in their tweet.</p>
<p>As respectful as this is, it is still their image or personal brand you see in your stream.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Twitter users ignored the retweet function in order to keep their brand awareness alive.  </p>
<p>This would be a huge shame.  The whole point of this new functionality is &#8216;transparency&#8217;, to help point to the original source of the tweet.</p>
<p>As always, only time will tell&#8230;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
