<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Original Retweets&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/</link>
	<description>A blog about software development while traveling..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe_carney</title>
		<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>joe_carney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmershotel.com/?p=42#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Opinion seemed to be divided over this Twitter release.  Looks like transparency was one of the things Twitter were going for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can read the full reasons behind the new feature from the man himself...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://evhead.com/2009/11/why-retweet-works-way-it-does.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://evhead.com/2009/11/why-retweet-works-way...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion seemed to be divided over this Twitter release.  Looks like transparency was one of the things Twitter were going for.</p>
<p>You can read the full reasons behind the new feature from the man himself&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://evhead.com/2009/11/why-retweet-works-way-it-does.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://evhead.com/2009/11/why-retweet-works-way.." rel="nofollow">http://evhead.com/2009/11/why-retweet-works-way..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmershotel.com/?p=42#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by joe_carney: Original Retweets on Twitter &#124; Programmers Hotel http://bit.ly/mVryk...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by joe_carney: Original Retweets on Twitter | Programmers Hotel <a href="http://bit.ly/mVryk.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/mVryk..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe_carney</title>
		<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>joe_carney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmershotel.com/?p=42#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Well, the backlash has started already today.  Not everybody likes it, probably for some of the reasons mentioned above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe they shouldn&#039;t have called it retweet, &#039;Like&#039; could have been a better word to have used.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a shame that transparency will always be lost.  Human nature I guess.  Still, from what I understand, sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://tweetmeme.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tweetmeme.com&lt;/a&gt; will be able to track the original source of a tweet should that be as important as twitter think it is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lists &amp; Retweets within the space of a couple of weeks.  Twitter is certainly getting more interesting.  Not only for the users, but the developer community built around it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the backlash has started already today.  Not everybody likes it, probably for some of the reasons mentioned above.</p>
<p>Maybe they shouldn&#39;t have called it retweet, &#39;Like&#39; could have been a better word to have used.</p>
<p>It&#39;s a shame that transparency will always be lost.  Human nature I guess.  Still, from what I understand, sites like <a href="http://tweetmeme.com" rel="nofollow">http://tweetmeme.com</a> will be able to track the original source of a tweet should that be as important as twitter think it is.</p>
<p>Lists &#038; Retweets within the space of a couple of weeks.  Twitter is certainly getting more interesting.  Not only for the users, but the developer community built around it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Parks</title>
		<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmershotel.com/?p=42#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thats gonna make the importance of breaking news on twitter even more important, to be the first to hit that tweet...and may also cause some funny situations when that tweet turns out to be bollocks. (eg, the balloon boy incident).  Oh...  interesting times ahead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats gonna make the importance of breaking news on twitter even more important, to be the first to hit that tweet&#8230;and may also cause some funny situations when that tweet turns out to be bollocks. (eg, the balloon boy incident).  Oh&#8230;  interesting times ahead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandy Bee</title>
		<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandy Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmershotel.com/?p=42#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Good points about the new retweet functionality. I personally tire of excessive retweeters and unfollow them, so this would probably keep those people on my follow list longer. I will miss the ability to RT with comments though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points about the new retweet functionality. I personally tire of excessive retweeters and unfollow them, so this would probably keep those people on my follow list longer. I will miss the ability to RT with comments though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Original Retweets on Twitter &#124; Programmers Hotel -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://programmershotel.com/2009/11/original-retweets/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Original Retweets on Twitter &#124; Programmers Hotel -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmershotel.com/?p=42#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by joe_carney and joe_carney, Keith Spitalnick. Keith Spitalnick said: RT @joe_carney: Original Retweets on Twitter &#124; Programmers Hotel http://bit.ly/mVryk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by joe_carney and joe_carney, Keith Spitalnick. Keith Spitalnick said: RT @joe_carney: Original Retweets on Twitter | Programmers Hotel <a href="http://bit.ly/mVryk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/mVryk</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
